1 posts categorized "Using Time-Stretch with Samples"

March 19, 2011

Using Time-Stretch with Samples

Time Stretching Might Help with Timing, But Not Always Good for the Sound; Tempo Modification an Effective Alternative


I prefer to stay away from time-stretching samples. Although I understand the primary benefits of it—for example, it helps with tempo matching and the like—, I do not like what you often give up in return: sound and texture quality! Once you stretch a sample (or any sound, for that matter), the sound "changes," and along with that sound change is a mood and feel (vibe) change. I think of it like going from natural to synthetic. Thus, for me, if I need to fit something to a tempo, I first manipulate the overall tempo. I owe all of my understanding to tempo adjustments to my DJ background. Therefore, when the timing is "off" in a beat, I don't think about "correcting" the timing; instead, I think more along the lines of mixing and blending the musical elements with the tempo that's being driven home by the drums.

In the rare occasions where tempo modification alone doesn't work, I modify the velocity and volume of certain sounds within the beat. In fact, sometimes I do both of these steps together. Either way, my aim is to make sure each element of sound meshes together within the rhythm I've established. Moreover, it's important for me to stay away from "corrective" functions as much as possible. In this way, I feel more connected to the DJ'ing tradition of hip hop/rap music, the foundation of beatmaking.

Finally, here, I should mention that I know a number of beatmakers who time-stretch their samples, but it's worth noting that they do it not for "effect," but as a last resort, when something's not matching up—and even then they do it in a fairly limited manner.

The BeatTips Manual by Sa'id.
"The most trusted source for information on beatmaking and hip hop/rap music education."

Dedicated to exploring the art of beatmaking in all of its glory.

Your email address:

  • Donate Sidebar

  • BeatTips Top 30 Beatmakers

  • Build Your Skills

  • Top 5 Myths About Sampling and Copyright Law

    "Sampling is piracy."
    WRONG! Piracy describes the wholesale, verbatim copying and distribution of copyrighted works. That is not sampling; that's something entirely different.
    Read more

    "You can legally sample and use any recording up to 1, 2, 3, or 4 seconds."
    WRONG! Under existing copyright law, there is no clear, predetermined length (amount in seconds) that is “legally” permissible to sample.
    Read more

    "If you use samples on a free mixtape, it’s perfectly O.K."
    WRONG! A free mixtape does NOT permit you to use samples from copyrighted recordings without the permission of the copyright holders.
    Read more

    "Sampling is easy; there’s nothing to it. Anyone can do it well."
    WRONG! Sampling is an art form that requires technical skill, imagination, and artistic understanding.
    Read more

    "Sampling involves the use of pre-recorded songs only."
    WRONG! While the art of sampling is most commonly understood to include the use of pre-recorded songs (traditionally from vinyl records), source material for sampling includes any recorded sound or sound that can be recorded.
    Read more

  • BeatTips
    Essential Listening

    BeatTips.com is a website dedicated to music education, research, and scholarship. All the music (or music videos) provided on this site is (are) for the purposes of teaching, scholarship, research, and criticism only! NOTE: Under U.S. Code, Section 107 “Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use” of the Copyright Act of1976: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching… scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." (U.S. Code)